Skip to main content

Reaching for the Stars: Carl Sagan’s Contact and the Quest for Meaning

Carl Sagan is undoubtedly one of the most brilliant minds I’ve had the pleasure of exploring through his writing. Earlier this year, I embarked on a journey through Sagan’s works—a decision that came about almost on a whim. I had made a New Year’s resolution to read more non-fiction, and in January, I picked up Cosmos. I was blown away.

From there, I read Pale Blue Dot, followed by The Dragons of Eden, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, and Billions and Billions: Thoughts on Life and Death at the Brink of the Millennium. Each book left me more enamoured than the last. Sagan's ability to convey dense, complex concepts with such eloquence and clarity is nothing short of brilliant.

Initially, I didn’t plan to immerse myself so deeply in Sagan’s catalogue. But as I turned the final pages of Cosmos, I couldn’t resist diving headfirst into more of his work. His voice, his ideas—they simply resonate with me.

When I picked up Contact, it was no different. I wasn’t surprised at all by how much I loved it. The book feels like a culmination of his non-fiction and essays, woven into a scientifically rich work of fiction. It reads like a companion piece to The Demon-Haunted World, so much so that I’d argue it’s essential reading to fully appreciate the broader ideas Sagan explored. That’s not to say these books must be read in a particular order, but enjoying one will undoubtedly enhance the experience of the other. Contact makes it clear where many of its ideas originated.

One of Sagan’s most impressive feats is his ability to navigate the interplay between religion and science—two deeply contested subjects—with breathtaking ease. In Contact, he takes the principles of clear, rational thought from his nonfiction works and integrates them seamlessly into a deeply entertaining narrative.

That said, Contact is a slow burn. It’s quite technical, which might deter some readers who find it dry. But I urge anyone who picks it up to give it a chance. In my opinion, the deliberate pacing works exceptionally well as Sagan balances philosophy and science on a razor’s edge with effortless grace.

Everything he’s written (at least, what I’ve read so far) feels purposeful. Whether he’s discussing humanity’s place among the cosmos, reflecting on our “pale blue dot,” or exploring skepticism and religion, each idea fits perfectly into his broader narrative. And there’s so much more to unpack.

Contact is not only a great entry point into Sagan’s vision of humanity, but it’s also a fantastic standalone story. The narrative remains grounded, set mostly on Earth, with technology that feels plausible and rooted in reality—only stretching into the speculative where necessary to tell this epic story of humanity’s place among the stars. The level of detail is astonishing.

Interestingly, I find it hard to categorize Contact purely as a science fiction novel. Perhaps this is a semantic argument, but to me, it feels more like a fictionalized exploration of his scientific ideas. It’s every bit as quintessentially “Sagan” as his non-fiction works.

The book tackles profound philosophical questions with incredible nuance. Questions like, “What is God?” and “What would happen if we discovered a more intelligent presence in the universe?” are explored in ways that leave a lasting impact.

While this review may feel more like a love letter to Carl Sagan than a focused critique of Contact, I think that’s a testament to the man himself. His brilliance, humanity, and unique outlook on the universe shine through in every word he wrote. Contact is no exception.

If you’re a fan of science fiction, this book is a must-read. If you’re someone who values clear thought and seeks to understand the world around you (and I hope that applies to everyone), pick up this book. But don’t stop there. Dive into the rest of Sagan’s works—they’re profoundly important.

Carl Sagan’s contributions to bringing science into public consciousness cannot be overstated. For that, I’m endlessly grateful. He has had a profound impact on my life, and I’m confident that if you give his work a chance, you’ll feel the same way.

“It’s far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.”
– Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

Comments

  1. Did you see the film adaptation? What did you think? How does it compare to the book?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I actually haven't watched the film yet, but will definitely try to watch it at some point and will let you know!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Roadside Picnic is One of the Best Sci-Fi Novels Ever Written

Roadside Picnic was written by two brothers, Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, in 1971 and published in 1972 in the Soviet Union. I'm a huge fan of film and an avid reader, though I have never seen the movie Stalker . Still, the image of three men standing in what looks like dust, surrounded by the ruins of a massive old factory, is striking and iconic. It’s beautiful. I recently saw that same image on a book cover at the bookstore— Roadside Picnic . The cover alone sold me. This is a very short but incredibly dense book, packing a lot into its limited page count. I went into it knowing nothing, and honestly, that’s the best way to experience it. The mystery, the slow revelations—it all made for an extremely engaging, intellectually stimulating read. Since it’s a Russian-to-English translation, I didn’t know what to expect. Russian literature has a reputation for being deeply philosophical and intense, though I haven’t explored many of the greats yet (something I hope to change soon). ...

Why Dr. Bloodmoney Is the Strangest Post-Apocalyptic Story You'll Ever Read

Philip K. Dick continues his trend of writing some of the strangest novels imaginable, and I’m all here for it! His works are endlessly fascinating, and Dr. Bloodmoney: Or How We Learned to Get Along After the Bomb is no exception—it’s a fever dream of a story, a brilliant exploration of Cold War fears, though with an oddly optimistic outlook. Sort of. Either way, it was an absolute thrill to read. First off, I love the title. It’s perfect. As a huge fan of Dr. Strangelove: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb , I find this novel to be a bizarre yet fitting science fiction counterpiece to Kubrick’s classic film. The two are completely unique, but they make for fascinating companion pieces. Interestingly, the book was actually written before the movie was released, but when it came time for revisions, editor Donald Wollheim suggested that Dick reference Dr. Strangelove —a change that, in my opinion, really works. As stated, this book is bizarre, but that’s what makes it...

Why Outer Dark is Cormac McCarthy’s Most Unsettling Masterpiece

This book is wild. Just reading the back cover, I knew I was in for something crazy, but Outer Dark surpassed even my wildest expectations. Outer Dark back cover: "A woman bears her brother's child, a boy; he leaves the baby in the woods and tells her he died of natural causes. Discovering her brother's lie, she sets forth alone to find her son. Both brother and sister wander separately through a countryside being scourged by three terrifying and elusive strangers, headlong toward an eerie, apocalyptic resolution." This is an extremely dark read, but I loved every word McCarthy wrote. It was fantastic. As I mentioned in my review of All the Pretty Horses , Cormac McCarthy is probably my favourite author. Outer Dark continues to reinforce that belief. Interestingly, as I started reading Outer Dark , a Vanity Fair article surfaced claiming that Cormac McCarthy had a 16-year-old muse late in his life. While I haven’t been able to access the full article due to subsc...