Skip to main content

Child of God Lights a Candle in the Darkness No One Wants to Face

Child of God
is horrific. It’s fantastic. And it’s one of the most disturbing books I’ve ever read.

People love to talk about Blood Meridian as Cormac McCarthy’s darkest and most disturbing work, and while it certainly is, Child of God affected me far more. I think part of that is because Blood Meridian is an epic—its violence feels distant, almost mythological. As readers, we’re pulled back, observing Glanton’s gang from afar. Even the protagonist, "the kid," remains nameless; his identity doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things. This narrative distance makes the horror feel abstract, part of something larger.

But Child of God is different. It’s intensely personal. We are trapped with Lester Ballard, forced to witness his descent in an uncomfortably intimate way. This difference isn’t a flaw in Blood Meridian—it’s by design. But for me, it made Child of God feel so much more brutal, for lack of a better word.

As much as this book disturbed me, I also loved it. No surprise here—McCarthy can write. His prose is raw, unflinching, and unmatched by anyone I’ve read. He never holds back, and he doesn’t offer easy escapes.

It’s funny—just recently, I reviewed South of the Border, West of the Sun by Haruki Murakami and titled my review "Not Every Character Needs to Be Good, and Murakami Proves It." But Child of God takes that idea to the extreme. While skimming Goodreads after finishing the Murakami book, I saw many negative reviews criticizing it because readers “hated” Hajime, the protagonist. Sure, he’s deeply flawed and wrongs the people he loves, but to me, that’s not a reason to dismiss a book. Not every character is meant to be likable.

But by comparison? Hajime is a saint. Lester Ballard is a straight-up psychopath, committing some of the most heinous acts imaginable. McCarthy takes us to places we don’t want to go, forcing us to confront the animalistic depths of human nature. Child of God is a study in extreme nature vs. nurture—what happens when a man is utterly rejected by society, left with nothing but his own depravity.

How McCarthy came up with this, or what made him decide to write a story like this, I have no idea. But he does it masterfully.

I think this is the most challenging book I’ve ever read—not in terms of difficulty (it’s quite accessible for a McCarthy novel in terms of writing), but because it spits in the face of humanity. And I mean that as a compliment.

Like so many others, I love McCarthy’s work. I’m close to finishing all of his novels—only Suttree and The Orchard Keeper remain. Some I’ve even reread. Maybe one day I’ll try to rank them, but that almost feels like doing his writing a disservice. I don’t know where Child of God would fall on my list, but it completely blew me away in its own depraved, unflinching way.

Child of God is not for everyone, but for any McCarthy fan, I think it’s worth reading. If you’ve read it, I’m curious to hear your thoughts—insanity!

Also, has anyone read McCarthy’s plays or screenplays? Are they worth diving into? I haven’t read a play since high school, Shakespeare, so I’d love to know if they’re worth checking out.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Roadside Picnic is One of the Best Sci-Fi Novels Ever Written

Roadside Picnic was written by two brothers, Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, in 1971 and published in 1972 in the Soviet Union. I'm a huge fan of film and an avid reader, though I have never seen the movie Stalker . Still, the image of three men standing in what looks like dust, surrounded by the ruins of a massive old factory, is striking and iconic. It’s beautiful. I recently saw that same image on a book cover at the bookstore— Roadside Picnic . The cover alone sold me. This is a very short but incredibly dense book, packing a lot into its limited page count. I went into it knowing nothing, and honestly, that’s the best way to experience it. The mystery, the slow revelations—it all made for an extremely engaging, intellectually stimulating read. Since it’s a Russian-to-English translation, I didn’t know what to expect. Russian literature has a reputation for being deeply philosophical and intense, though I haven’t explored many of the greats yet (something I hope to change soon). ...

Cyberpunk’s Bible? Why Neuromancer Still Reigns Supreme

This book is brilliant. There's no other way to put it. BRILLIANT! William Gibson’s Neuromancer is, in my opinion, a work of genius. I read it for the first time this year, in 2025, and it still feels modern—refreshing, even. Pop culture has drawn heavily from this book, and for good reason. While I’m not certain that this is the first cyberpunk novel ( Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? comes to mind as an earlier example), Neuromancer stands out. It has endured because of the atmosphere it radiates—its vivid, electrifying world, its tone, its style. I can’t think of another book with more striking imagery or prose so perfectly attuned to its story’s essence. Gibson sets the tone from the very first sentence: “The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.” That single line encapsulates the novel’s world—bleak, technological, and surreal. And the atmosphere it establishes carries flawlessly throughout. Speaking of Do Androids Dream of Electric S...

Why Dr. Bloodmoney Is the Strangest Post-Apocalyptic Story You'll Ever Read

Philip K. Dick continues his trend of writing some of the strangest novels imaginable, and I’m all here for it! His works are endlessly fascinating, and Dr. Bloodmoney: Or How We Learned to Get Along After the Bomb is no exception—it’s a fever dream of a story, a brilliant exploration of Cold War fears, though with an oddly optimistic outlook. Sort of. Either way, it was an absolute thrill to read. First off, I love the title. It’s perfect. As a huge fan of Dr. Strangelove: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb , I find this novel to be a bizarre yet fitting science fiction counterpiece to Kubrick’s classic film. The two are completely unique, but they make for fascinating companion pieces. Interestingly, the book was actually written before the movie was released, but when it came time for revisions, editor Donald Wollheim suggested that Dick reference Dr. Strangelove —a change that, in my opinion, really works. As stated, this book is bizarre, but that’s what makes it...